Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew MacDonald's avatar

I voted no across the board.

I don't like what Vespucci did, or Columbus in his treatment of the original inhabitants. But name changing is "virtue signaling." It say we're better and we wouldn't do that. In that time and place we might have.

Keep the name and work together with indigenous people. Here in Canada we often stoke tension between the races by institutionalizing past grievances, when we are free to work together now. We have a grievance industry between native and whites that has nothing to do with respect or love. And there's a race-hustler industry too, huge.

The Word Herder's avatar

I voted "yes" because the brutal men who "discovered" the so-called Americas were horrible to the native Peoples here... VICIOUS. HORRIFIC. DESPICABLE. (Vespucci, Cortez, Columbus... et al)

So yes, it would be a good thing, I'd say. And I'd also say that perhaps we might poll some of the progeny of those Native Peoples, living today, and ask THEM what they might like the new name(s) to become...

"Turtle Island" is great, but... are we an "island," really?

I won't suggest any new names right now, I will think on it, but it does seem a good idea.

21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?